2003.06.04 11:40
Re: David Rimanelli
Rimanelli's ENTRIES seem a waste of printed space, not because of what is written, but because it's all already dated by the time it's published. Editorially speaking, this stuff belongs on www.artforum.com where it would be more 'timely'.
2003.06.04 20:01
Re: David Rimanelli
David,
What you write and how you write are enjoyable, but there isn't all that much unique about it in these days of split-second electronic communication. For example, all i got is this lousy's ongoing reports (here at talkback) of her many visits to Cremaster/Guggenheim are just as valuable/valid as ENTRIES.
Following the Pincus-Witten historical precedent is (I suppose) admirable, but is it anything beyond that? Try thinking Pincus-Witten with a website cum following.
Steve Lauf
2008.06.04
art
A series of laser prints (on Artforum pages) entitled "Price List" which will be lists of my artworks and their prices. It will again be the "advertising of art", advertising as art, even.
| |
2017.06.04 16:57
|
