Duchamp After Unbekannt
Stephen Lauf




2026.04.04
The Philadelphia Inquirer



Philadelphia Museum of Art curator Matthew Affron in the Duchamp gallery on March 4, 2026. Marcel Duchamp’s "The Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, Even (The Large Glass)," is at right.
Tom Gralish/Staff Photographer

"Now and for at least the next several months, the Duchamp gallery will evoke the way the artist and others installed it in 1954, with some of the very same works.

Instead of being a single-artist collection, the new hanging presents Duchamp’s work in conversation with those of his contemporaries--Picasso, Juan Gris, Piet Mondrian, Georges Braque, and others.

The installation spotlights Duchamp’s relationship with the PMA, which was like no other. The museum was a particularly fruitful meeting of artist, curator, and collector; and that relationship paid dividends. Many of the works in the current temporary show, "Marcel Duchamp, Curator," were originally acquired by major collectors Louise and Walter Arensberg with help from Duchamp."



2025.04.04
451 Rhawn Gallery

So It Wasn't A Daydream After All



2023.04.04
Fox Chase Farm

15:36



2017.04.04

pages from   Flowers Stamped



2008.04.04
READING LIST
I can't answer for others, but lately my architectural theories involve a conjunction of Erlebnis und Erfahrung.




2004.04.04
Re: Is Mainstream the New Radical
When exactly is emotional growth in an artist's work apparent? what are the examples of this kind of perceptible thing?
So you're asking whether artist's emotions that perceptually grow are therapeutic?
Does the work come with a price tag? Is that what you're really asking?



2003.04.04
Re: The Last Taboo?
What the Taliban did was assimilation in the extreme, i.e., purge. Just like when our bodies assimilate in the extreme, i.e., purge.
Assimilation and metabolism are two distinct corporal physiologies. Assimilation is basically absorption of nutrients and the purge of that which is left after full absorption. Metabolism is a creative/destructive process (catabolism and anabolism) which releases energy. Metabolism is a basic tenant of life itself. Thus creative /destructive duality is a basic tenant of life itself.
In 1981, the Sammlung Architektonischer Entwurfe (a collection of 176 prints delineating architectural designs) by Karl Friedrich Schinkel was republished by Exedra Books to commemorate the 200th anniversary of Schinkel's birth. The box set of prints (edition of 1000) cost $500.00, and I bought number 476 (I think) October 1981. By 1984 Exedra Books went bankrupt and Baluster Books bought them out, which included a large quantity of sets of Schinkel prints that were never boxed or sold. Baluster, I luckily found out from a friend that collects architecture books, was selling the unboxed print sets for $100.00, so I bought a second set of prints. This was lucky for me because I could now replace the several prints from #476 that I had already mutilated—this was right around the time when I saw CAD (computer aided design) acting as iconoclast toward manual dexterity; I mutilated some Schinkel prints to 'illustrate' that computers were iconoclastically changing /revolutionizing manual dexterity. By the early 1990s I began to incorporate selected prints from the second set of Schinkel prints into the CAD process by ink plotting cad files onto them and then water coloring the plotted portions of the prints—not at all different than what the Chapmans did with the Goya prints.
Here's what I thought then and now:
1. Yes, I knew what I was doing would be 'shocking', but I was also doing something that exhibited my own inner courage, which is what was most valuable to me.
2. Yes, the prints were 'valuable', and for me the prints were now really good/expensive art materials, like the very best oil paint and the very best canvas/linen or something, etc. etc.
3. I was then acting/arting out an iconoclasm that I saw came with the advent of computers within creative activities.
4. In the late 1990s I came to realize that metabolism is a creative/destructive duality, and that there is indeed a metabolic human imagination, and artistic activity can utilize the metabolic imagination.
5. In 2002, during an email discussion at design-l, I came to realize that I was sometimes doing art that was by nature appositional, i.e., creating art by adding another layer to existing art. [Remember I apposed Borofsky in 1984?]
Big Question:
Is anyone else opining within this thread actually speaking from first hand experience? I feel first hand experience is more valuable than any other type of experience. Maybe because no one else can then destroy a first hand experience already had.



Exhibit One Apposing Schinkel

Re: The Last Taboo?
What you inferred early on about the Chapmans' work being like graffiti from the past is uncannily insightful. An aspect of that specific work that perhaps you first saw--I'd like to hear more. What you say about the issue of viewer reaction is also completely worthwhile. I'm with you on this too.
What the Roman emperors did is part of the practice of damnatio memoriae, a particularly ancient Roman political practice, and their also putting their own head upon what has been erased, manifests palimpsest. Damnatio memoriae plus palimpsest is a somewhat 'rare' set within damnatio memoriae in general. I see damnatio memoriae as again assimilation in the extreme.
I just temporarily 'hung' 12 metabolized Schinkel prints within The Curatorium.
"Destroying" art to "create" art. Is it really shocking to do something we viscerally do all the time just to live? I thought art was life now-a-days anyway.



1950.04.04
1950. Tuesday, New York City
As Lou and Walter Arensberg's representative, Duchamp attends a luncheon meeting with a special committee formed of the Metropolitan Museum's president, Roland L. Redmond, Francis Taylor and a trustee, Elihu Root, Jr. to discuss the possible donation of the Arensberg Collection to the Metropolitan.
The committee proposes to guarantee that the Arensberg Collection be exhibited "in three adjacent galleries, each approximately 20 x 40 feet" for five years, after which it would be "consolidated" with the general collection of the museum "but each object... would be appropriately labelled as the gift of Mr and Mrs Arensberg". At Duchamp's request, the committee agree to prepare an aide memoire covering the points discussed at the meeting.
Ephemerides




««««                                                                                     »»»»

Duchamp After Unbekannt



www.museumpeace.com/dau/0013m.htm
Stephen Lauf © 2026.04.04